UK to Spend £2.6bn on Greener Mobility: Where Should the Money Go?

Last month, the United Kingdom (UK) carried out a budget review addressing key allocations to boost E-Mobility.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves pledged 2.6 billion pounds to decarbonise transport over the next three years.

This includes 1.4 billion pounds to support the continued uptake of electric vehicles (EVs), including vans and heavy goods vehicles (HGVs).

In addition, 400 million pounds has been allocated to support the development of charging infrastructure.

However, Dunstan Power, Director of ByteSnap Design and its EV charging division Versinetic, told Mobility Portal Europe that “it is still unclear how the remainder of the budget will be spent.”

E-mobility Subsidies: Which Ones Make Sense – and Which Don’t?

Countries that currently lead in EV sales, such as Norway and Denmark, introduced high taxes on cars years ago. They recognised that vehicles pollute, congestion is a problem, and maintaining infrastructure is costly.

At the same time, they developed effective public transport systems.

When the first EVs appeared, they chose to exempt them from these taxes, making them cheaper than petrol cars.

“Citizens not only didn’t see prices rise, but also realised these cars were actually cheaper. So it was easy to convince them,” says Power.

He contrasts this with the UK’s approach: “The problem the United Kingdom faced—along with other countries that didn’t impose high taxes on conventional cars—was that EVs were more expensive, partly because production volumes were low and the technology was new. That’s why the market needed an initial boost.”

However, Power acknowledges that there are now several low-cost electric vehicles available in the country.

That’s why he suggests that “perhaps continuing to directly subsidise EVs is no longer the best use of public money.”

“It would be good to have a free market for electric cars, without high tariffs, and to support manufacturers in staying competitive,” he adds.

It’s also worth noting that, unlike five years ago, there is now a strong second-hand electric market, making used EVs more affordable.

So, considering that the price of new cars is falling and used EVs are now accessible, “the argument that we need to subsidise new units is becoming less convincing.”

In this regard, he says subsidies should now focus on understanding why some people still haven’t adopted EVs—and on addressing those barriers.

One major issue, he explains, is that many people don’t have home parking where they can install a charger, nor do they have access to on-street charging points.

“Minister Reeves must not be intimidated by the lobby”

There is no doubt that the current British Government is showing a firmer commitment to E-Mobility.

“The previous administration held a critical stance towards electric vehicles. In contrast, the current one seems more receptive to scientific evidence and aligned with the energy transition,” the executive states.

However, he laments that E-Mobility has become a politically charged issue.

“Five years ago, there was a general consensus that it was a positive development, but over time, powerful lobbying efforts have pushed back,” Power warns.

Since the matter involves the use of public funds, he acknowledges that it inevitably takes on a political dimension.

“The problem is that the debate has become polarised. People adopt extreme positions: either everything about EVs is good, or everything is bad,” he says.

In this context, Power stresses: “Minister Reeves must not be intimidated by the lobby, which has politicised an agenda that should not be so ideologically driven.”

READ MORE